“The Next Asbestos” they say, but where PFAS and asbestos differ is in the longevity and reach of these forever chemicals. Manufacturers must get ahead of the risk.
Fifty years ago, a naturally occurring heat resistant mineral came under scrutiny for its cancer-causing fibers. That ore? Asbestos.
At the time, the 1970s, the Consumer Product Safety Commission banned asbestos in some home building materials used in things like wallboards and fireplaces, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration implemented regulations on asbestos use and exposure.
Today, society at large is well aware of the negative health impact asbestos can cause if used in building materials today.
So, what about PFAS?
“PFAS, also known as forever chemicals, are a group of widely used chemicals that serve as a coating to generally enhance or improve the durability of a product,” explained Brian Kramer, manufacturing practice lead at The Hartford. “These types of chemicals have been in use since about the 1930s, with the primary applications focusing on nonstick and waterproof coatings.”
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, were used to enhance products humans use every day — much like asbestos in its hey-day. But again, like asbestos, PFAS are facing scrutiny over health and safety risks.
“PFAS are dubbed ‘forever chemicals,’ because the chemical structures are believed to be very persistent in the environment and in the human body — meaning they don’t break down and they can accumulate over time,” said Rob Gaus, technical manager – Risk Engineering Team at The Hartford.
Many say PFAS are the “next asbestos,” but unlike its 1970s counterpart, PFAS are still manufactured in products overseas today, which companies can open up to liability and health-related claims.
Understanding PFAS and the Health Risk
A class of more than 9,000 chemical compounds, PFAS are prevalent in products that resist heat, oil, stains, grease and water.
“Their favorable properties made them ideal for many everyday products, such as cell phones, tablets and semi-conductors, and surgical gowns and drapes,” Gaus said.
Considering PFAS are prevalent in several household products, as well as utilized in foam spray used by fire departments to put out fires, these chemicals are getting into households, groundwater and even food.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has investigated the environmental impact of these chemicals, but recent studies on the adverse impact PFAS chemicals can have on humans is driving this issue to the forefront. What makes them so scary is the “forever chemical” label attached to PFAS. These products are not easily broken down in the environment and can accumulate inside a human’s bloodstream.
Current peer-reviewed scientific studies have found a link between higher levels of PFAS and increased high blood pressure in pregnant women; developmental delays in children, like low birth weight; increased risk of prostate, kidney and testicular cancers; increased risk of heightened cholesterol levels; and others, according to EPA reporting.
“While legacy PFAS-specific compounds are no longer manufactured in the US, PFAS are still manufactured globally,” said Gaus. “Hence, potential liabilities may also be ‘imported’ into the US”
Impact on Manufacturing and Other Industries
Because PFAS are manufactured chemicals, those in the manufacturing space must review the liability risks associated with them.
“Manufacturers, importers, wholesalers and/or distributors that sell or have sold products with performance attributes, such as grease-, stain-, oil- or water-resistance and fire retardancy may contain PFAS, are most at risk,” said Gaus.
To break it down even more, it is manufacturers in the cosmetics, textiles, food packaging, furniture, nonstick cookware, carpet and firefighting foam industries that could see the brunt of scrutiny as the public becomes more and more aware of these forever chemicals.
“Businesses that are most at risk beyond chemical manufacturers and heavy industrial users are businesses that are either producing, importing, selling or have sold products that contain these chemicals,” Kramer said.
Lawsuits are already rolling in.
As an example, since 2005, chemical company EI du Pont de Nemours Inc. has been named a defendant on more than 6,100 PFAS-related lawsuits. 3M was hit with a $214 million liability price tag in 2019 after a court decided its history of manufacturing and disposing of PFAS chemicals was subpar. An example of the magnitude of the financial impact is the fact that 3M recorded $762 million in litigation-related charges in 2019 related to PFAS matters.
The majority of legal cases have focused on groundwater contamination, but it’s evident that consumer class actions related to alleged injury from products that contain PFAS are also on the rise.
Mitigating PFAS Risk
With so many products containing PFAS, it might be hard to determine where to start to mitigate liability exposure. But starting by acknowledging the chemicals’ impact can go a long way.
“Now is really the time to evaluate current and past usage of these products. Data can help engage and consult with legal, and staying in front of the changing regulatory landscape is important,” Kramer said.
Additionally, manufacturers and their risk teams are best served by reviewing PFAS risk of partners along the entire value stream. That includes importers, distributors, manufacturers and any other company that may have used PFAS in its manufacturing processes.
“Conduct a baseline self-audit for possible exposure to PFAS risk, both historic and current,” advised Gaus.
“Areas to consider may include investigating PFAS content in current and past company products, formulations and purchased goods, including oil-, stain- and water-repellent materials, lubricants, coatings; identifying past handling and use of fluorinated fire-fighting foams both in training and any emergency incidents; reviewing off-site disposal of PFAS-containing wastes; and evaluating possible liability protections under contracts with suppliers of PFAS-containing materials.”
It’s also key to partner with risk and insurance professionals proficient in both manufacturing and environmental risk so that PFAS liability can be addressed from both sides.
Further, risk professionals at companies facing PFAS risk should always have a clear understanding of the legal and regulatory developments surrounding PFAS.
“PFAS enforcement is increasing at the federal and state level,” Gaus said. “Risk managers will need to review recent EPA enforcement actions, which have included administrative orders, complete removal actions abating health or environmental threats, information requests, monitoring requirements, and increased inspections.” &
The information provided in these materials is intended to be general and advisory in nature. It shall not be considered legal advice. The Hartford does not warrant that the implementation of any view or recommendation contained herein will: (i) result in the elimination of any unsafe conditions at your business locations or with respect to your business operations; or (ii) be an appropriate legal or business practice. The Hartford assumes no responsibility for the control or correction of hazards or legal compliance with respect to your business practices, and the views and recommendations contained herein shall not constitute our undertaking, on your behalf or for the benefit of others, to determine or warrant that your business premises, locations or operations are safe or healthful, or are in compliance with any law, rule or regulation. Readers seeking to resolve specific safety, legal or business issues or concerns related to the information provided in these materials should consult their safety consultant, attorney or business advisors. All information and representations contained herein are as of [insert current month and year].
Links from this site to an external site, unaffiliated with The Hartford, may be provided for users’ convenience only. The Hartford does not control or review these sites nor does the provision of any link imply an endorsement or association of such non-Hartford sites. The Hartford is not responsible for and makes no representation or warranty regarding the contents, completeness or accuracy or security of any materials on such sites. If you decide to access such non-Hartford sites, you do so at your own risk.
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., (NYSE: HIG) operates through its subsidiaries, including the underwriting company Hartford Fire insurance Company, under the brand name, The Hartford®, and is headquartered in Hartford, CT. For additional details, please read The Hartford’s legal notice at www.thehartford.com. © 2022 The Hartford